<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bill Archives - ILoveDogsAndPuppies</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/tag/bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/tag/bill/</link>
	<description>The better I get to know men, the more I find myself loving dogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:11:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>New Bill Would Retire Military Dogs With Their Handlers</title>
		<link>https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-retire-military-dogs-with-their-handlers-2/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-retire-military-dogs-with-their-handlers-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr.Dog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adopt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dog News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/?p=8181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ryky and Ready to go. FORWARD OPERATING BASE FALCON, Iraq – Ryky, a three-year-old Belgian Malanois, is partnered with Sgt. James Harrington, a military policeman and dog handler from New Orleans, and is assigned to the 947th Military Police Detachment, part of the 3rd Infantry Regiment, “The Old Guard,” stationed out of Fort Myer, Va., attached to the 1st Special Troops Battalion, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, Multi-National Division – Baghdad. The duo conducts cache search operations and route clearance in the Rashid district of southern Baghdad.(U.S. Army photo courtesy of Sgt. James Harrington, 1st BCT, 4th Inf. Div., MND-B) Senators across the country are lobbying for a bill to be passed that would ensure the care of military dogs after their retirement.  Deemed “military equipment,” many are left behind to fend for themselves, but now politicians are pushing for laws that would make it mandatory for them to be brought home, and preferably given to their handlers. “After all we know about treating debilitating post war conditions, like PTSD and other health afflictions, it makes absolute sense to keep service members joined with their service dogs,” Schumer said. “To know that after all these years, this unresolved issue...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-retire-military-dogs-with-their-handlers-2/">New Bill Would Retire Military Dogs With Their Handlers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com">ILoveDogsAndPuppies</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/148.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="590" height="394" class=" size-full wp-image-8182 aligncenter" src="http://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/148.jpg" alt="1" srcset="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/148.jpg 590w, https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/148-300x200.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 590px) 99vw, 590px" /></a><strong>Ryky and Ready to go. FORWARD OPERATING BASE FALCON, Iraq – Ryky, a three-year-old Belgian Malanois, is partnered with Sgt. James Harrington, a military policeman and dog handler from New Orleans, and is assigned to the 947th Military Police Detachment, part of the 3rd Infantry Regiment, “The Old Guard,” stationed out of Fort Myer, Va., attached to the 1st Special Troops Battalion, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, Multi-National Division – Baghdad. The duo conducts cache search operations and route clearance in the Rashid district of southern Baghdad.(U.S. Army photo courtesy of Sgt. James Harrington, 1st BCT, 4th Inf. Div., MND-B)</strong></p>
<p>Senators across the country are lobbying for a bill to be passed that would ensure the care of military dogs after their retirement.  Deemed “military equipment,” many are left behind to fend for themselves, but now politicians are pushing for laws that would make it mandatory for them to be brought home, and preferably given to their handlers.</p>
<p>“After all we know about treating debilitating post war conditions, like PTSD and other health afflictions, it makes absolute sense to keep service members joined with their service dogs,” Schumer said. “To know that after all these years, this unresolved issue stands in the way of our veterans and their beloved four-legged friends is unfair and misguided. The federal government has always stood strong with veterans, supporting them and giving veterans the resources to return home and lead productive lives. That’s exactly why Congress should support this cause, because our veterans say it helps; it’s good for them. Here we have a commonsense policy that is good for the animals that give it their all for America – and for the American heroes who love these dogs so dearly.”</p>
<p>Though you may have heard it before it still comes as a shock to think that it’s not uncommon for <a href="http://www.lifewithdogs.tv/2014/09/us-abandons-military-dogs-overseas/">military dogs to be left behind</a> in the countries where they served, which is a load of crap coming from governments that spend billions of tax dollars on the military budget each year.  Sadly, they don’t spend nearly enough providing for veterans – human and canine – once they complete their service.</p>
<p>Most handlers and other platoon members view their dogs as brethren out on the battlefield, and would love to have the dogs come home with them, but at the very least want them to have a home.</p>
<p>Megan Leavey is one of many veterans who jumped at the chance to have her canine, Rex, come home to her when he was to be retired.  They served together on two very dangerous tours in Iraq, but it took five years for them to be reunited, and they didn’t have much time left.</p>
<p>“Those eight months I had with him, when we got back together, couldn’t have asked for anything better,” she said.</p>
<p>Now at least two senators – Ron Wyden of Oregon and Chuck Schumer of New York are hoping to see a change in the treatment of these important veterans.</p>
<p>“Right now the military says presumption is for the owner not to get the dog unless they fight, fight, fight to get it,” Schumer said.</p>
<p>He and Wyden are pushing to get the Military Working Dog Retirement Act of 2015 passed, which would require the Pentagon to arrange and fund the transport of retired military dogs back to the US.</p>
<p>“The bond between these military working dogs and their handlers is unique,” Wyden said in a statement. “By bringing these dogs that have served alongside our men and women in uniform back to the United States, this bill can provide assistance to veterans while supporting the close bond between these dogs and our soldiers returning home.”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-retire-military-dogs-with-their-handlers-2/">New Bill Would Retire Military Dogs With Their Handlers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com">ILoveDogsAndPuppies</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-retire-military-dogs-with-their-handlers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Bill Would Allow Owners to Have Deceased Pets Buried with Them</title>
		<link>https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-allow-owners-to-have-deceased-pets-buried-with-them/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-allow-owners-to-have-deceased-pets-buried-with-them/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr.Dog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 14:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Dog Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owners']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Would]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/?p=7411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When we die, many of us and our loved ones prefer to include little trinkets in our caskets – photos, jewelry, etc.  Many would also like to have their previously deceased pets included.  A new bill in Massachusetts would make it legal for pets to be buried alongside their owners. State Representative Nick Collins has sponsored Bill 3272, which was petitioned by Dorchester resident Bill Trabucco.  Some 5,000 cemeteries in the state would be able to designate land for the “co-internment … of the bodies of humans and their pets.” In some states, similar laws have already been enacted.  In Virginia, pets may be buried alongside their owners, but not in the same coffin.  In Florida, provided that the pet has died first, remains may be entombed with their human. “Animals have suffered in silence for far too long. They have amazing qualities that the human race can only aspire to,” Trabucco told the Boston Herald. “Going forward, they will rightfully be protected through effective Massachusetts legislation.” Thomas Daly, chairman of the Massachusetts Cemetery Association’s Legislative and Consumer Affairs Committee, believes there has been an increased demand for pet/owner burials, and feels that all opinions should be regarded before making...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-allow-owners-to-have-deceased-pets-buried-with-them/">New Bill Would Allow Owners to Have Deceased Pets Buried with Them</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com">ILoveDogsAndPuppies</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/01.jpg"><img decoding="async" width="590" height="394" class=" size-full wp-image-7412 aligncenter" src="http://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/01.jpg" alt="0" srcset="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/01.jpg 590w, https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/01-300x200.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 590px) 99vw, 590px" /></a><br />
When we die, many of us and our loved ones prefer to include little trinkets in our caskets – photos, jewelry, etc.  Many would also like to have their previously deceased pets included.  A new bill in Massachusetts would make it legal for pets to be buried alongside their owners.</p>
<p>State Representative Nick Collins has sponsored Bill 3272, which was petitioned by Dorchester resident Bill Trabucco.  Some 5,000 cemeteries in the state would be able to designate land for the “co-internment … of the bodies of humans and their pets.”</p>
<p>In some states, similar laws have already been enacted.  In Virginia, pets may be buried alongside their owners, but not in the same coffin.  In Florida, provided that the pet has died first, remains may be entombed with their human.</p>
<p>“Animals have suffered in silence for far too long. They have amazing qualities that the human race can only aspire to,” Trabucco told the <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/06/bill_allowing_burial_of_pets_with_owners_to_be_considered">Boston Herald</a>. “Going forward, they will rightfully be protected through effective Massachusetts legislation.”</p>
<p>Thomas Daly, chairman of the Massachusetts Cemetery Association’s Legislative and Consumer Affairs Committee, believes there has been an increased demand for pet/owner burials, and feels that all opinions should be regarded before making it a law.  He also wonders whether or not the law would allow people to be buried with their animals in pet cemeteries.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">“We’re trying to get our arms around this very, very quickly,” Daly said. “As a pet owner, you want dignity and respect for your pet because they’re part of the family. Are we ready to allow them to be in the same grave together? There needs to be more discussion. Even though it’d be great, we have to look at it in a much bigger picture.”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-allow-owners-to-have-deceased-pets-buried-with-them/">New Bill Would Allow Owners to Have Deceased Pets Buried with Them</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com">ILoveDogsAndPuppies</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ilovedogsandpuppies.com/new-bill-would-allow-owners-to-have-deceased-pets-buried-with-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
